The Plan Worked. So Why Change It?
It’s a question I hear a lot from athletes after a successful season:
“Last year’s training worked. So why wouldn’t I just do the same thing again?”
On the face of it, that makes perfect sense. You got fitter, raced well, and achieved a goal you’d been working towards for months. Why mess with something that clearly delivered the goods?
The short answer is this: because the athlete starting this training cycle isn’t the same athlete who started the last one.
And that’s actually good news.
Success Changes the Athlete
When training works, it changes you. You become fitter, stronger and more durable, capable of handling training loads that would have felt challenging six months or a year earlier. That’s exactly what we’re aiming for.
The irony is that the very reason a plan worked so well is often the reason it shouldn’t simply be repeated. Training creates adaptation. Once you’ve adapted, the same stimulus doesn’t always produce the same response.
The sessions that once pushed your fitness forward may now simply help maintain where you are. What was once challenging becomes familiar. What was once highly effective gradually becomes less productive.
That doesn’t mean the original plan was wrong. Quite the opposite. It means it did exactly what it was supposed to do.
What Got You Here Won’t Always Get You There
Imagine a runner preparing for their first marathon. Often the biggest improvements come from relatively simple things: training consistently, gradually increasing weekly mileage, learning how to pace long runs and establishing better recovery habits.
For many athletes, just getting those fundamentals right unlocks a huge amount of progress.
Fast forward a year and that same athlete is in a very different place. They’re handling those training weeks more comfortably, recovering more effectively and carrying a much bigger aerobic engine than they had before.
At that point, repeating exactly the same programme might keep them fit, but it may no longer be the most effective route to further improvement. The next step could require more threshold development, greater race specificity, improved durability late in long runs or more focused work on a particular limiter.
The target has changed because the athlete has changed.
I was reminded of this recently with one of my athletes. Their FTP had increased after a really productive spell of training, which was exactly what we wanted to see. The training had worked and their fitness had improved.
The challenge was that the targets we’d been using no longer reflected their current fitness. Had we left everything unchanged, sessions designed to create a specific adaptation would have gradually become less effective simply because the athlete had moved on.
The training itself wasn’t wrong. The athlete had simply progressed beyond the numbers it was originally built around.
Updating their FTP wasn’t about changing a successful plan for the sake of it. It was about making sure the training continued to challenge them in the right way and produce the adaptation we were looking for.
The plan hadn’t stopped working.
The athlete had simply become fitter.
That’s often what’s happening when a coach adjusts a programme after a successful training block. It’s not because the previous approach failed.
It’s because it succeeded.
Keep the Framework, Not Necessarily the Plan
This is where progression is sometimes misunderstood.
When coaches talk about changing a programme, athletes often imagine ripping everything up and starting from scratch. In reality, that rarely happens.
Most of the things that contributed to success are usually still worth keeping. Consistency, progressive overload, sensible recovery, long-term thinking and training that fits around real life remain just as important as they were before.
What changes is how those principles are applied.
Perhaps the volume increases. Perhaps the emphasis shifts towards threshold work. Perhaps recovery is managed differently or more attention is given to a specific weakness. The foundations stay the same, but the details evolve to reflect the athlete standing in front of us today rather than the athlete who existed a year ago.
Progression Isn’t Reinvention
One of the biggest myths in endurance sport is that improvement requires dramatic change.
It usually doesn’t.
Most successful progression looks fairly unremarkable from the outside. A long run is adjusted. A key session evolves. The focus of a training block shifts slightly to address a different need. The changes are often subtle, but they’re purposeful.
The best plans frequently look very similar to the ones that came before them. The difference is that they’re solving a different problem.
Progression isn’t about constantly reinventing training. It’s about applying the right training at the right stage of development.
A Simple Question to Ask
Before deciding to repeat a successful programme, it’s worth asking a simple question:
What do I need now that I didn’t need before?
That question alone often reveals where progression should happen.
You can take it a step further by asking yourself:
- What improved most during the last training cycle?
- What’s still holding me back?
- Which sessions delivered the greatest return?
- Which sessions delivered very little return?
- What does my next goal require that my previous one didn’t?
The answers will usually tell you far more than simply looking at a race result and concluding that the plan worked.
The Real Goal
The aim isn’t to find one perfect training plan and follow it forever.
The aim is to continue developing as an athlete.
Good training should change you. It should leave you fitter, stronger and more capable than when you started. Once that happens, the training needs to evolve alongside you.
That’s why effective coaching isn’t about endlessly repeating what’s worked before. It’s about understanding why it worked, recognising what has changed and deciding what comes next.
Because ultimately, the goal isn’t to repeat the plan that made you successful.
It’s to become the athlete who no longer needs it.
-
Why Athletes Fail by Chasing the Perfect Training Plan
One of the most common questions I hear after a successful season is, “Why change…
-
Running Made Simple: Understanding Intensity Domains
This guide explains the four exercise intensity domains, where the science came from and how…
-
Track Speed vs Race Performance: The 5k/10k Truth
Smashing 200s but struggling in 5ks? You’re training the wrong system. Discover why your race…